Re: Updating the wiki

Sheila Mooney <sheila-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As far as information hierarchy stuff goes, I like the format that we  
already started to put together.

http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/WikiReTaxonomy

On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote:

> We're trying to kick start the wiki project again. First I'd like  
> to ask everyone to answer the following:
>
> + What features do people like about the current wiki?
> + What features are missing from the current wiki?
>
> Here are my examples. Please copy and paste in your answers:
>
> + What features do people like about the current wiki?
>
> 1. The page loading are fairly quick–I use checkpoint a lot.
> 2. The editor is simple. Easy to use, easy to find. As long as  
> you're not doing anything to complicated.
> 3. Finding the Cosmo project page (which is the pages I'm in the  
> most) is on the left nav and fairly easy to find.
>
> + What features are missing from the current wiki?
>
> 1. Information hierarchy problem and I cannot locate pages directly  
> when I need them.
> 2. If you want to do something a bit more complicated in the  
> WYSIWYG editor, it starts to act funny. ie. adding tables.
> 3. A better search engine. Difficulty finding pages. Maybe because  
> there is an OSAF site, OSAF blog, wiki, bugzilla and addition HTML  
> pages for specs??
>
> -Priscilla
>
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.