Re: Updating the wiki

> + What features do people like about the current wiki?

I like the wiki-ness of the wikis. I always feel free to fix things,  
add notes, etc.

Attachments work really well, and help communicate ideas.

> + What features are missing from the current wiki?

Well I wouldn't call this "missing features", but.. I don't like the  
number of wikis. I think "Projects" and "Journals" should be merged -  
it doesn't serve any purpose to separate them. We can just have a top- 
level topic called "Journals" under which those kinds of things can  
go. If anything, we should have "Chandler" and "Cosmo" as wikis.

For the hierarchy issue, an automatic two-level tree of child and  
grandchild pages, perhaps in the left sidebar of the parent page  
would help a lot. The wiki has the information, it's just not being  
displayed. Is this a job for a plugin? Would it kill performance?

Also, I seem to be experiencing a bug with the latest wiki upgrade:
	http://chandler.tnir.org/2006/09/osaf-wiki-issue-stuck-cookie

Apply grains of salt as needed.. :-)

Reid

On Sep 18, 2006, at 13:09, Priscilla Chung wrote:
> We're trying to kick start the wiki project again. First I'd like  
> to ask everyone to answer the following:
>
> + What features are missing from the current wiki?
>
> Here are my examples. Please copy and paste in your answers:
>
> + What features do people like about the current wiki?
>
> 1. The page loading are fairly quick–I use checkpoint a lot.
> 2. The editor is simple. Easy to use, easy to find. As long as  
> you're not doing anything to complicated.
> 3. Finding the Cosmo project page (which is the pages I'm in the  
> most) is on the left nav and fairly easy to find.
>
> + What features are missing from the current wiki?
>
> 1. Information hierarchy problem and I cannot locate pages directly  
> when I need them.
> 2. If you want to do something a bit more complicated in the  
> WYSIWYG editor, it starts to act funny. ie. adding tables.
> 3. A better search engine. Difficulty finding pages. Maybe because  
> there is an OSAF site, OSAF blog, wiki, bugzilla and addition HTML  
> pages for specs??
>
> -Priscilla

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general