Re: RE: [Design] Requirements?

Arnulv Rudland wrote:

>  
>
>
>There are now so many good ideas lying around, that it is difficult to go
>any further before a clearer concept about organisation and direction of
>movement is established. This is a part of the further development, that the
>product- and community management staff at OSAF will take the lead. I have
>the feeling, that many of the vivid design list participants are keeping a
>low profile at the moment, eagerly waiting for Chih-Chao Lam and Mitchell
>Baker to take charge. (Hi there, Mitchell and Chih-Chao ! are you listening?
>:-)
>
>  
>
You bet we're listening.  We're trying to get our heads around the 
project status, since we're new to this, identify existing info that 
would be useful to post, and drive some basic documentation. For 
example, a chunk of thinking has been done about calendaring.  I've 
suggested that we ought provide a  overview of basic calendar plans, a 
description of how the calendar fits in with the general architecture 
(RDF repository/database, etc.) and other packages, and perhaps a list 
of topics we know need to be addressed.   This info would also provide 
context for subsequent, more detailed discussions.  We also need to 
provide some basic responses to the many suggestions received to date. 
 I believe these would be the mose helpful starting points.  

Of course, let me know if you think differently.

Mitchell

>  
>



_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Process" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/process