Re: Not sure if this news is real, or a spoof...
Sarbajit Roy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABun1Lxo9uaUeuNoMtyMWXLfvOkpJbX4nib4eSMPX5OeSz60BQ@mail.gmail.com> |
The Petitioner is a Jain Acharya. Wonder what he thinks of this "Lesbian Photo shoot" [ http://photogallery.indiatimes.com/fashion/indian-models/racy-lesbian-photoshoot/articleshow/9908530.cms ] in a online site owned and actively run by his community people. What about the "Jain Shudh Vanaspati beef tallow" scandal. What about this Jain TV channel called Paras TV. 20% of their programing consists of sari clad housewives bathing the private parts of their menfolk in all their (shrivelled up) details. On 7/12/13, sajan venniyoor <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, the petitioner also wants to ban the export of > meat< http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/Petitions/Committee%20on%20Petitions/meat%20e.pdf > > (specifically > beef). He has a thing about raw meat. > > Sajan > > On 12 July 2013 22:42, Punit Rathod <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The actual petition is here: >> >> http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/Petitions/Committee%20on%20Petitions/cyber%20e.pdf >> >> Can also be accessed from the below link (Sr. No. 11) >> http://164.100.47.5/newsite/press_release/pet_show.aspx >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Vickram Crishna >> <v1clist-/[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Here's the operative portion of the press release (the language is >>> entirely theirs, and linguists may spend years trying to understand what >>> kind of creature invented it): >>> >>> /The petition is signed by Jainacharya Vijaya Ratnasundersuriji and >>> three >>> others and countersigned by Shri Vijay J. Darda, MP, Rajya Sabha. >>> >>> It has been stated in the petition that more than two-third of the >>> India's population is below of 35 years. This large section of the >>> population, which is the hope for the country's future, is getting >>> digressed, distorted and distressed on account of the growing free sex >>> culture through cyber pornography. Petitioners have further stated that >>> Cyber pornography is creating an extremely bad effect on the adolescent >>> children and even adults giving rise to various types of problems of >>> psycho-physical nature, Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD), sexual >>> deformities etc. This is also instrumental in raising incident of sexual >>> exploitation of children. Today, besides computer and television, the >>> mobile phone become a very handy source for adolescents to view such >>> porn >>> sites. >>> >>> 2. The petitioners have made a vehement prayer that steps be taken to >>> check cyber pornography which is having an extremely bad effect on the >>> country's youth as well as the adults leading to various types of social >>> and medical problems as well as perpetration of crime. In this >>> connection, >>> they have advocated for amendment in IT, 2000, so as to make pornography >>> on >>> computer/mobile a crime >>> entailing severe punishment to the producers, distributers and viewers >>> of >>> such sites. / >>> >>> About the only thing that may be verifiable in the petition is the names >>> of the petitioners. >>> >>> Still, I wonder at the Acharya's certainty about cause and effect, not >>> to >>> mention his inability to lead by example, or even by teaching, that he >>> should want to ask for unspecified changes in a bad law. >>> >>> Vickram >>> communicall.wordpress.com >>> Yahoo! Mail on Android >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> * From: * Akshay Mishra <[email protected]>; >>> * To: * sajan venniyoor <[email protected]>; >>> * Cc: * india-gii <[email protected]>; >>> * Subject: * Re: [india-gii] Not sure if this news is real, or a >>> spoof... >>> * Sent: * Fri, Jul 12, 2013 3:24:53 PM >>> >>> I was part of a team developing a product for a telecom major in India >>> few years back. It was a Internet + display developed in-house. >>> >>> After having completed everything, the board reviewed and there were >>> comments like requiring redder red and brighter blues and other hues. >>> After >>> this insightful discussion, everybody was packed off except the >>> marketing >>> chap, the CEO and myself. >>> The CEO then took the device went to a couple of porn sites - checked if >>> he see moving images at the lowest resolution. After being satisfied >>> this >>> way, he went to discuss commercials after telling - this is the only >>> thing >>> that is viewed across the country and if hope to touch sufficient >>> volumes >>> we should ensure that the content that is desired is visible. >>> >>> I walked enlightened. :-) >>> >>> India might have to outsource re-production from the way these people >>> talk about sex. >>> >>> -Akshay >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12 July 2013 20:40, sajan venniyoor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11 July 2013 21:00, Sarbajit Roy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There was a public notice today in some leading newspapers from Rajya >>>>> Sabha. >>>>> Persons watching cyber porn will be severely published. Law being put >>>>> in place, objections/suggestions are invited from public to Amend IT >>>>> Act. >>>>> http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/press_release/Press/Committee%20on%20Petitions/Cyber.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> According to the petitioner, internet porn leads to "dangerously >>>> increasing" numbers of teenage pregnancies. This must be true, as data >>>> suggests that "teen pregnancy in India is high with 62 pregnant teens >>>> out >>>> of every 1,000 women. In comparison, 24 British teens get pregnant >>>> before >>>> their 19th birthday while the figure is 42 in the US" *(2008 UNFPA >>>> report). * >>>> >>>> At least half those pregnant Indian teens could be watching internet >>>> porn with their men, as 47% of our girls are married off before 18. >>>> >>>> Sex education is also to blame. The petitioner believes that it helps >>>> spread "free sex culture and increase in pornography" and leads to >>>> sticky >>>> biology text books in school libraries or something. >>>> >>>> Sajan >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does India-Gii wish to engage ?? CAN India-Gii engage ? >>>>> >>>>> On 7/11/13, Srini RamaKrishnan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > I'd like to remind the list that the honorable minister insisted not >>>>> > too long back that every Facebook and Orkut post and youtube video >>>>> > had >>>>> > to be reviewed by a FB / Google employee before posting it to the >>>>> > web >>>>> > to produce a safer web. >>>>> > >>>>> > He is a crusader par excellence for the safety of the web; his >>>>> > record >>>>> > speaks volumes for how safe he has made the web. Without his earnest >>>>> > efforts the web would have been a hive of filth and immorality. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> India-gii mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> India-gii mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> India-gii mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> India-gii mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii >> >> > _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/india-gii