Re: "Free" WiFi in Delhi
sarbajit roy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGW_Wnwq1wtOMxeeHYknTWts6FKz42WQHPEi6e0p1+DCvwmNsQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Vickram, In case you hadn't noticed, the question is about the "committee" itself, and which was why I posted to this list in the first place seeing as how 3 regular posters here apparently constitute this committee. You may have also overlooked that I had linked to relevant documents setting up the case for potential conflicts of interests. I could equally allege, and I shall if the silence persists, that A or B were appointed BECAUSE they are conflicted - and hence predisposed to a certain outcome. Its also curious that nobody on this list is willing to comment on the licencing and other legalities of offering pervasive free WiFi in Delhi.. I can also tell you one more thing, my name and that of 3 other "activist" persons who had replied to the official public notice were removed as speakers at the last moment to prevent us from making presentations or voicing our concerns; and also to accommodate several telecom corporates who came in through the back door of the Delhi Dialogue Commission at the n'th moment sensing the golden goose. Perhaps Mahesh, as a member of DDC - or its WiFi task force, can respond directly, since I haven't imputed any villainy on his part, instead of making me complain to the GoNCTD. Sarbajit On 4/26/15, Vickram Crishna <v1clist-/[email protected]> wrote: > When the question is phrased differently, it kinds of deflates. > > A. If the committee suggests a monopoly/duopoly... (I have seen no > recommendation, and see no point crying fire before the smoke appears)... > > You have insinuated that Mahesh might contribute to a situation where a > company in which he or his fund is invested gets all or part of some unknown > cash cow in public WiFi. If he does, he will get some solid flame on this > list, and from here it will doubtless spread to both the social and > traditional media. > > > But he hasn't. > > > I refuse to be a party to such unfounded speculation, for which the term > insinuation is apt. Still, since you doubtless have some reason of your own > for believing in his villainy, if he ever does, I am confident we will get > to hear about it in two ticks of a cow's tail, and no prizes for guessing > who will alert us. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > From:"sarbajit roy" <[email protected]> > Date:Sun, 26 Apr, 2015 at 2:50 pm > Subject:Re: [india-gii] "Free" WiFi in Delhi > > Vickram > > To dumb it down, since you and Arun and others were the ones fighting > for unrestricted micro-FM, micro-cells-wireless mesh etc... > > A) Do you support creation of monopolies / duopolies of Statewide > micro-communication hotspots in a hasty / non-transparent manner ? ie. > a hijack in the name of the deprived. > > As for me, I have done my homework - right or wrong, and I believe > that 'Arvind-ki-dukaan' is wide open for business,and I am protesting > !! > > Sarbajit