Re: "Free" WiFi in Delhi
sarbajit roy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGW_Wnz6CtT7R9m7XebNczFKeqWMfQQFVvbL+fAvzSc3g=N0Aw@mail.gmail.com> |
Vickram To dumb it down, since you and Arun and others were the ones fighting for unrestricted micro-FM, micro-cells-wireless mesh etc... A) Do you support creation of monopolies / duopolies of Statewide micro-communication hotspots in a hasty / non-transparent manner ? ie. a hijack in the name of the deprived. As for me, I have done my homework - right or wrong, and I believe that 'Arvind-ki-dukaan' is wide open for business,and I am protesting !! Sarbajit On 4/26/15, Vickram Crishna <v1clist-/[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for noticing that I dabble in questions of freedom of speech and > protection of individual rights. > > You seem to have discovered that the gentlemen concerned are members of AAP, > some of Karnataka AAP. Not sure how this, by itself, disqualifies them or > qualifies them from advising on issues concerning wifi, which has not yet > been made subject to the flavour of government in power at either the > regional or national level. > Is it an insider group? Is it empowered nonetheless to make executive > decisions at the national level? If yes to the first (I haven't said so) but > no to the second, I am not sure why we should care. You must be aware that > member's Bills in Parliament are necessarily created by private insider > groups, not elected or appointed officials, but at the end of the day, they > go through public oversight just like everything else (not that I think that > that oversight is always dispassionately conducted, but that is a different > discussion). This is pragmatic, whether or not it guarantees the best of all > possible worlds. > If you meant something else, then I did not get the gist of your message. > Vickramhttp://communicall.wordpress.comhttp://vvcrishna.wordpress.com > > > On Sunday, 26 April 2015, 13:47, Suresh Ramasubramanian > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mahesh is not from Karnataka and anyway all three are citizens of India so > I don't quite see the problem represented by this regionalistic pov > > --srs > >> On 26-Apr-2015, at 1:11 pm, sarbajit roy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I am surprised since as far as I >> know Pranesh and Mahesh are from Karnataka. > > _______________________________________________ > India-gii mailing list > India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] > https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii > > > >