the confusion about net neutrality
Arun Mehta <[email protected]> Thu, 14 May 2015 17:24:03 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHk29vQu9TRCeoWqAakGSj-k6PbC4k56F5y_SPrkXTuiu77Nng@mail.gmail.com> |
Restricting Net neutrality is a lose-lose option, imo. When you look at each packet to see whether it gets preference or not, you slow down the traffic drastically. So much so, that even access to the preferred sites is likely to be slower. Asking TRAI to regulate experimentation? Terrible idea. Arun Mehta __ http://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/pranesh-prakash-on-definition-of-net-neutrality/article7188661.ece Definition of Net Neutrality should be flexible: Pranesh Prakash The definition of Net Neutrality should be flexible enough to allow for experimentation with different models of providing cheaper Internet access and such experimentation needs to be regulated by the telecom regulator, Telecom and Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) according to Internet expert Pranesh Prakash. Mr. Prakash was reacting to the business model of Boston-based start-up Jana, which said it had figured out a way to offer billions of people in the emerging world free access to the Internet, without violating the web’s open nature. _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii