Article - Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are killing the web
Ruchir T <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Jan 2016 01:17:38 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.telecom.india-gii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJpeQM+dQqP9dA2JcmoYC1VrKjNZV2YT-=rJqsFNdB+YJ8TWxA@mail.gmail.com> |
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/29/irans-blogfather-facebook-instagram-and-twitter-are-killing-the-web Good read above - underscores the fact that these are early days of the web in the sense that it is early to give any one entity too much power by preferential peering that makes it difficult for other startups to rise. The current crop of startups may not be the best for a population, the further one looks down the horizon. This is not just about net neutrality (of course). Even if you agree with a preferential network web for technical reasons such as QoS, or a pet theory of socialism being the root of all evil, there is no reason to support tying net access to what is essentially a single data hungry app. One way to think of this issue is in analogy with another media such as a radio channel. A company is making the following offer: you will get access to my cool channel (free information! ain't I generous ?), while I get exclusive access to find out all private details about you and serve you targetted ads. No other channels for you. Even if you decide to opt out of the deal, I'll keep information collected about you indefinitely. I also don't pay for the radio spectrum - people who have access to non-exclusive channels will pay your cost to the telecom providers for you. Makes sense ? Not to me - at minimum the cost of the spectrum (network) has to be borne by this exclusive broadcaster, else it has successfully externalized its costs and risks and gained exclusive subscriber access without paying any of the significant costs involved. _______________________________________________ India-gii mailing list India-gii-IAPFreCvJWP2/[email protected] https://lists.india-gii.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii