Re: Research on software help // Me too
[email protected] Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:28:17 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.bay-area |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What Meghan wrote (i.e., I ditto that). ljr On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Meghan Ede wrote: > From my personal experience running usability studies: > > - people get really pissed off when "help" simply rephrases the > interface e.g. "under the file menu, you will find..." > > - people are usually looking for "how" to do something, rather than > an explanation of the UI, especially tips, tricks or trouble-shooting > > - it takes only a few (usually only one) bad experience with a piece > of unhelpful help content for the user to stop using help altogether > on that product > > - more technical users are, in my experience, more likely to persist > with a help system or online documentation than consumers, because > often the tasks they are performing require specific and correct > actions and errors can have huge impacts; they also annotate and > copy over good, useful help content - to an internal resource, such > as internal wiki > > - a great way to get feedback about your online help/documentation > is to include a brief online survey incorporated into the help/doc > system, along the lines of: > > 1. How helpful was this topic (then have a rating scale) > 2. What were you looking for? (open-ended) > ... _______________________________________________ This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions