Re: Making the Case for Usability (Jared Spool)

Laura Malone <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.bay-area
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I don't know if anyone has mentioned John Rhodes new book "Selling Usability." It's basically a handbook of Guerilla tactics for "usability infiltration tactics." I'm reading it now and I'm sure you would find lots of helpful insight there. He takes a practical, yet political approach. One of his primary messages is not to try to sell it head-on, but to adopt the language of your company's culture. For instance, don't use the term "users" but instead "customers" -- people the decision makers and influencers really care about. Also, figure out how usability contributed to the results of successful projects to usability, (even if it wasn't called that) and promote it vigorously. 

 Laura Malone





----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:00:01 PM
Subject: Discussions digest, Vol 1 #411 - 1 msg

Send Discussions mailing list submissions to
    [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
    [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Discussions digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Making the Case for Usability (Jared Spool)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Cc: <[email protected]>
From: Jared Spool <[email protected]>
To: RH <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [BayCHI Discussions] Making the Case for Usability
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:49:44 -0700

On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:29 AM, RH wrote:

> Can anyone share any thoughts or studies around justifying usability
> research within a large corporate environment? If so, it would be  
> greatly
> appreciated. Specifically, I9m interested in ROI for performing  
> usability
> and user experience work for Web sites or applications versus not  
> doing so.

In my experience, ROI arguments never work. They are only  
justifications for already-made-decisions. If someone doesn't want to  
do something, the most persuasive ROI argument still won't convince  
them.

The real trick is to follow the money. When there's poor usability or  
user experiences, it usually impacts the organization on its bottom  
line. (Lost sales, increased support costs, or extra development work  
from rework, for example.)

When there's money that's being lost on the bottom line, there's  
usually someone in the organization already charged with recovering  
those losses. Find that person and you've got your champion.

I wrote about this in more depth here:
The Cost of Frustration
http://www.uie.com/articles/cost_of_frustration/

and here:
A Recession Strategy for Web Apps
http://www.uie.com/articles/recession_strategy_webapps/

Hope that helps,

Jared

Jared M. Spool
User Interface Engineering
510 Turnpike St., Suite 102, North Andover, MA 01845
e: [email protected] p: +1 978 327 5561
http://uie.com  Blog: http://uie.com/brainsparks  Twitter: @jmspool
UIE Roadshow: Seattle, Denver, DC in June: http://is.gd/gxwe


--__--__--

_______________________________________________
This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list digest, [email protected]
To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions


End of Discussions Digest
_______________________________________________
This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected]
To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.