Re: FYI - re Health IT and Usability
[email protected] Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:04:49 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.bay-area |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
These are ALL examples of the importance of the usability community's participation in health IT initiatives by the HHS right now. I urge all of you to cc the individual at the HHS email address I posted previously. Without the participation of you - the professional UI community, HHS efforts to affect healthcare costs in the United States may be a lot less than the overwhelming majority of Americans (on all sides of the healthcare reform issue) wish it to be. Again, that email address (and I believe there is an actual human being at this address) is: [email protected] ...and if anybody here is going to MacWorld in San Francisco, let me know. I'd love to meet up with BayCHI folks there. Best, LjR On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Greg Austin wrote: > The publishing of those comments lagged behind their upload by at > least a week. Therefore, they are not coded to instantaneously > publish information, like a blog is--these comments are being > received by an entity, then later published by an entity. The > mechanism (and reason) for that intermediary step can only be > construed as censorship. > > Greg > On Feb 8, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Wendy Cown wrote: > >> I see several comments by Greg on the post. Are there more that >> are being >> suppressed? Some that aren't even relevant to the conversation >> have been >> approved so I see no censorship or stifling by politics happening >> in this >> case. >> >> Wendy >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Brian Krause <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The comment process for federal regulations predates the Internet >>> and was >>> not designed to be interactive. The commenters respond to the >>> proposal, not >>> to each other. >>> >>> Back in the days of paper, the government would collect the >>> comments, and >>> then publish them in print at the end of the comment period. The >>> regulators >>> and the public get the same printed copy. >>> >>> To the folks at regulations.gov, publishing batches of comments >>> seems like >>> a great step forward, though obviously it doesn't compare with >>> instantly >>> updated comments like you'd find on a blog. >>> >>> I hope this doesn't discourage anybody from participating. >>> >>> --Brian >>> >>> >>> On Feb 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Greg Austin wrote: >>> >>> Galileo demonstrated: Throughout history science has been stifled by >>>> politics. >>>> >>>> Similarly, these HHS people don't want the truth and will fight to >>>> suppress it; too much money is involved in propagating lies. Not so >>>> different from other other corporatist organizations. >>>> >>>> Thanks anyway. >>>> >>>> Greg >>>> On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>> Ugh. Suggesting to all, though, this is maybe not a reason to >>>>> discontinue commenting... including making note of just what >>>>> happened here. I think it's precisely why the HHS needs to hear >>>>> from >>>>> usability people (often and loudly). Thank you for making an >>>>> effort, >>>>> though. >>>>> >>>>> ljr >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 2, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Greg Austin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I left multiple comments on that site--however, they have been >>>>>> censored, or otherwise not approved by the admin. >>>>>> >>>>>> Real classy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Greg >>>>>> On Jan 30, 2010, at 10:51 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello all. >>>>>>> You may find the following on the US government's Health IT >>>>>>> site of >>>>>>> particular interest. I hope that folks here will consider >>>>>>> contributing. Unless we in the usability field are take the >>>>>>> time to >>>>>>> contribute, we may well see yet more unusable versions of >>>>>>> everybody's >>>>>>> idea of the 'best' electronic medical record. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> http://healthit.hhs.gov/blog/onc/index.php/2010/01/15/public-comments-period- >>>> open/comment-page-1/#comment-495 >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> ljr >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] >>>>>>> To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit >>>>>>> >>>>>> http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Greg Austin >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ljroseOnline.com____________________ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Greg Austin >>>> [email protected] >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] >>>> To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit >>>> http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] >>> To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit >>> http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Wendy Cown >> [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] >> To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions > > Greg Austin > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] > To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions ljroseOnline.com____________________ _______________________________________________ This is the BayCHI Discussions mailing list, [email protected] To change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe, visit http://baychi.org/mailman/listinfo/discussions