Re: [clug] low power device for VPN end point
David C <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:30:17 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.clug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAiewEQ9KQF8FWRMFZqXVVecGZuaMaL_xrbO27YAyUsrBiFPkw@mail.gmail.com> |
What is your target throughput? One user or many? Single threaded should not be a problem unless you need breathtaking speed. Will your traffic compress well? Is 73-100Mbps on an Atom good enough? Source: https://www.clearos.com/resources/documentation/clearos/content:en_us:kb_o_openvpn_performance On 9 Jan. 2017 22:23, "Tony Lewis" <tony-n3rzuiU5/[email protected]> wrote: I'm looking for a low power device to be a VPN end point, and I am after recommendations, please. The key requirement is high VPN throughput. I lean towards OpenVPN, but because it's single-threaded, it seems there are often struggles to get anywhere close to native throughput. I understand IPSec implementations are/can be multithreaded, so that might better fit the bill. HDMI and GPU and desktop stuff is not important. Just low power, high crypto throughput, high reliability and solid Linux support. Tony -- linux mailing list linux-w/[email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux -- linux mailing list linux-w/[email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux