Re: new scripting language available for testing... any takers?

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Russell Young wrote:

>
> Hi there,
>
> I have just pretty much finished writing a scripting language for a
> project (personal, unfortunately, not professional). It seems to me to
> work pretty well - it is a neat solution for what I needed, and I think
> can have some general application. Anyone interested in trying it out?

I would love to have a look.

BR
Grzegorz

>
> The language looks like C with minor differences to make scripting more
> convenient (no typing, default arguments, pass-by-value or
> pass-by-reference, macros, and a bunch more). The big advantage it has is
> object support. The objects are intended to be mainly wrappers for Java
> objects, allowing a lot of flexibility in working with java objects from
> the scripting environment. Functions can be defined either in the language
> itself, in "smart" java objects that understand the language, or (with
> some limitations) can call java objects directly. I used it to write
> output routines for a CD organizer, but I think it would be really useful
> for things like writing skins for java applications, or other things where
> you might want to make changes without mucking with the application source.
>
> The language code is small (70k jar file compiled, 60k for the source -
> though it could use some more documentation), and a good introduction to
> compilers for anyone interested in seeing how they work. I've been playing
> with it for a few days now and it seems pretty stable, so it should not be
> too big a waste of anyone's time but mine. Anyone care for a new toy?
>
> russell
> _______________________________________________
> blug-tech list
> [email protected]
> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-tech
>