Re: red hat and fedora

Pengcheng Zou <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
actually redhat has been doing business in China long before they
setup the BJ office early this month.a company called 里仁 (Li Ren)
seens to be its main sales channel, and you can buy RHEL fron Li Ren
or some other companies. the problem is it's almost impossible to get
"real" support even if you bought RHEL, but things may change soon.

as for Fedora, it's not a product of RH, so anybody can sell it to
anyone who don't have broadband connection.


On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 04:06:36 +0800, Colin Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Does that mean redhat who is entering China market starts to sell it's
> official products here?
> 
> BTW: What's the name for the supermarket?
> 
> It sounds interesting....  :)
> 
> 
> 
> Matteo Paiato wrote:
> 
> > Ciao Penguins!
> >
> > This evening I was shopping in a Supermarket close to my home, they
> > have a couple of shelfs for software and I saw the Box of Fedora Core
> > 3, the official one sold for 68 RMB.
> >
> > I looked the Box and is the same Company used to distribute red hat.
> >
> > ON the box there is still the red hat logo and some reference to red
> > hat.
> >
> > Do you know if there are any relations (common strategies or something
> > else)  between red hat and fedora for the chinese market?
> >
> > Good hacking to all!
> >
> > Matteo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > blug-general list
> > [email protected]
> > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blug-general list
> [email protected]
> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
> 
> 
> 
>
_______________________________________________
blug-general list
[email protected]
http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.