Re: Well this is going great guns.... NOT
Richard Ford <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing |
|---|---|
| Organization | Creditude |
| Message-ID | <1110258113.5186.108.camel@peach> |
But isn't that was the LSB (linux standards base is all about)? That is the ISV/IHV standard format and SUSE Enterprise, Red Hat Enterprise and many others all work to those standards... and always have.... I see the UL thing as a power play directed at Red Hat more than anything else.... On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:22 +0800, Pengcheng Zou wrote: > from UnitedLinux, I learned some lessons (again): > 1. long distance relationship never works. > 2. 4-some is too many to develop anything. > > the idea of UnitedLinux is actually not that bad, ISV/IHV love > standard Linux. the hard part is to have the common vision and > sustensible biz model of all the members. The implementation of > UnitedLinux failed, not just because SCO played some bad guy here, but > the product smells too much like SuSE, and SuSE is the only winner of > this UnitedLinux thing. in the end, real technology counts. > > Asianux is reaching 2.0 now, i do hope its effort will finally work. > > > On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:57:38 +0800, Richard Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.unitedlinux.com/ > > > > How do you say "I told you so" in Linux speak? > > > > In the face of logic, LSB standards and common sense. This whole united > > linux push was possibly one of the dumbest idea's ever. > > > > > > RF. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > blug-general list > > [email protected] > > http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ blug-general list [email protected] http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general