Re: [ot] chinese web pages encoding

"Jacques Vallin" <jvallin-Hpm9b9gv7FW2//[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.beijing
Message-ID <047001c42380$7926f9c0$b7906bda@sony>
Kenneth is right, it should be UTF 8.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Wong" <[email protected]>
To: "Beijing LUG general non-technical discussion list - Not publicly
posted" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [blug-general] [ot] chinese web pages encoding


> Why not do it in unicode (UTF-8) and if there's demand for the GB2312
> version, use a converter and create a GB2312 version? There should be a
> converter from UTF-8 to GB2312, since there are converters from BIG5 to
> GB2312 and so forth.
>
> Almost all new systems these days seem to handle UTF-8 with no major
> hiccups, so I would go with the wave of the future.
>
> Course, I'm not a chinese expert, so take anything I say with a pinch of
> salt. :)
>
> --
> Kenneth Wong
> IOSN Programme Consultant, UNDP-APDIP, Malaysia
> DID: +603 2091 5169 Fax: +603 2093 9740
> International Open Source Network: http://www.iosn.net
> UNDP Asia Pacific Development Information Programme:
> http://www.apdip.net
>
> On Friday 16 April 2004 14:14, Chris Drumgoole wrote:
> > My opinion is to do everything in UTF-8 - I think it is the
> > responsible thing to do, otherwise, if you do GB2312, then it just
> > adds to the number of sites that use GB2312, thus adding to the
> > annoying seperate charset/encoding problem we encounter everyday. THe
> > more sites that use UTF-8 exclusively will eventually make an impact
> > on those that don't... At least, that is my thought - too ideal?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Paiato Matteo wrote:
> > > Spaghetti learning already use a multilanguage system like PHPNUKE,
> > > when the language is selected the sript include all labels (labels
> > > are listed in saparate .php files) and the indication of the
> > > encoding. Once the language is selected maybe some pages contain
> > > part of the interface (in chinese) end other contents (maybe mixed
> > > english and Chinese).
> > > This to give more information
> > > Matteo
> > >
> > > On Apr 16, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Richard Ford wrote:
> > >> But if you want to change to other langauges later... why not
> > >> implement a unicode system now....?
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 13:05, Colin Zhu wrote:
> > >>> GB2312 is prefered, according to my experience. Chinese users
> > >>> will not need
> > >>> to change the encoding by hand then.
> > >>>
> > >>> Paiato Matteo wrote:
> > >>>> sorry for the non-linux related question.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm willing to start the localization of Spaghettilearning
> > >>>> (e-learning italian CMS) in chinese, which encoding is better to
> > >>>> use GB2312, UTF-8,
> > >>>> Unicode or ...?
> > >>>> thank for the advise!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ciao
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Matteo
> > >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> blug-general list
> [email protected]
> http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
>


_______________________________________________
blug-general list
[email protected]
http://list.beijinglug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blug-general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.