Re: Gentoo: "I'm not dead yet!"
Joseph Booker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.depaul-lug |
|---|---|
| Organization | neoturbine |
| Message-ID | <20091015155847.4d5ca63d@fenrir> |
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:40:05 +0000 [email protected] wrote: > I just read this article(found below), citing the recent changes to > the Gentoo, as well as some of the challenges it will have to > overcome in order to compete with the likes Fedora and Ubuntu. I know > some Gentoo users are on here, so, what do you guys think? Does > Gentoo have a long way to go, mending it's leg...or will it drag > until it bleeds to death? > > http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7570/2/ I think the high point of Gentoo was back when they had several core developers of upstream projects on it. Gentoo was the first distribution with reiserfs, somewhat with reiser4, and the Gentopia project was a sizable part of the Utopia project responsible for replacing automount with udev/hal/dbus (founder of udev is still a Gentoo dev while working for novell). Most big releases for KDE/Gnome had building scripts the same day or so, provided you told the package manager you are sure about building it (and you could be guaranteed the forums had guides for it). Core things like sane build systems and safe optimizations helped Gentoo users, and so much of Gentoo's help to upstream projects were very low-level. http://blog.flameeyes.eu is one developer with a fight against redundant .la files (they can mess up some toolchain stuff and cause more interdependencies then necessary for ELF files), restructuring of PAM in gentoo and has a collection of writings about the internals of linking in a GNU-userland. It shouldn't be underestimated how bad the infighting is. The maintainer of love-sources, a customized set of patches to the latest and greatest kernel that was too bleeding edge for gentoo itself, eventually switched to win2k. And several really important people have resigned over the years because of everything. It gets brought up occasionally, but the separation of official gentoo work into separate overlays (the equivalent of repos) has really taken some of the magic out of it. Still, how many other distros don't need ugly hacks to change your init system, kernel, partitioning scheme, CHOST, or let you use a system out of the box (well, after some compiling) completely without any program you'd like. I'm sure there is still a strong reason for people to use Gentoo, it is just sad that momentum seems to have been taken in different directions. I just hope the low-level stuff doesn't slow down too much with people switched to Ubuntu. :( -- Joseph Booker _______________________________________________ DLC mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.depaul.edu/mailman/listinfo/dlc Use the Above Link to Unsubcribe!! http://linux.depaul.edu/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrXjQwACgkQMX8g4/ndhm2WowCeKdaqjsBnbGh+ZPFgASy6LQ5h sCkAnAoyt1YVjY0ezMyfY9ikFxXabksM =CTwj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----