Re: Unity
Chris Morris <[email protected]> Thu, 05 May 2011 09:29:16 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.hawkes-bay |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just tried to run a liveCD of Natty64 on this machine - seems I dont have sufficient graphics power (GF7600/512mb/dua-lDVI) to run the unity side of things.. Well that's the decision made then - Gnome it is :) On 04/05/11 16:46, Erin Drummond wrote: > I am using it right now and I don't find it too bad. It would take a > bit of getting used to if you aren't used to using an OSX-style doc > and menus, but I dont find it slower to use. I actually prefer the > extra screen real estate and I find moving my mouse to the edge of the > screen to launch or focus any of my applications quite intuitive. I of > course added my most commonly used applications to the sidebar so I > could easily launch them without sifting through menus. I also like > the search feature for launching applications, since I often forget > which of the gnome menus an application is in. > > Unity also handles switching between multiple and single monitors much > better than classic gnome (in classic, if you add a panel to your > second screen so you can have a taskbar for windows on that screen, as > soon as you unplug the screen that extra panel moves to the first > screen. in Unity, it handles it all for you and you dont even need to > add the extra panel to start with). I like this feature because I have > a laptop which has an extra monitor attached at work, but not at home. > > I havn't tried the new gnome 3 shell though, although reports on the > internet say people like it better than Unity, so you could give that > a try