Massively Overloaded Linux Database?
Jonathan Day <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, the consensus seems to be that a large database of software would be more useful than the software itself on CDs. I can buy that argument. Freshmeat is OK at this, but you can't do contextual searches (yet) and you can't tell apt-get or rpm to fetch binaries through it. What's needed, if I am understanding this correctly, is a cross between "archie" (anyone remember that?), freshmeat, google, squid and an apt server, with a local cache of rare and frequently-requested software. The archie part would enable the server to identify who had what binaries for a given program. A Freshmeat-type database would give you a list of the most recent versions of a program, given the title of the software, rather than the filename. A Google-like search engine would give the user the ability to context-search. There is a lot out there, and you can't assume the user knows every single program by name, but they know the context in which they'll be using it. A squid-type proxy allows you to handle cached queries, forwarding those that can't be processed locally. The apt-server would be the wrapper around most of this gunk, so that retrieved data can be returned in a format that apt-get can handle. All the components are easy enough to obtain, but yeesh! I don't think anyone's really looked at combining them in quite this way. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover