Re: FC2

Robby Russell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.linux.pdxlug
Organization PLANET ARGON
Message-ID <1090606023.5617.18.camel@vacant>
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 11:15, Scott Burch wrote:
> I have run FC1 and FC2.  FC2 is unstable.  FC1 has been perfectly
> stable. I use FC1 every day on my servers and workstations.
> 
> With my customers, I still install FC1.  That would be my advise to
> anyone.  Wait for FC3 and see what happens.  FC2 was their first attempt
> at the 2.6 kernel and they are still working out the bugs.
> 
> Scott

I am running FC2 on 4 machines at home as desktops and dev boxes. My
main server in a colo is running FC1. As a desktop, FC2 has been much
more responsive..as a server, I don't really notice any differences.

I have had a few weird bugs with sound, but thats related to me having 3
sound cards in my machine and not taking the time to figure out how to
fix the issue. FC2 + the apt pkg from APT and a bunch of cool
repositories, it's a pretty nice distro...imho.


-Robby

-- 
Robby Russell | Owner.Developer.Geek
PLANET ARGON  | www.planetargon.com
Portland, OR  | [email protected]
503.351.4730  | blog.planetargon.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.