Re: LUGs in the Chicago area
James Velguth <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.luni.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What you think is important could be quite different that the original writer. Never remove any part of the message. You could completely change the message intent by deleting the important part and passing on the unimportant part. What somebody needs to do is create an email client that can identify each reply separately and then present it to the reader in the form they desire. Configured from Options, choose either "Read Forward" (bottom post) or "Read Reverse" (top post). I know the people in this technical discussion are intelligent enough to create such an add on. It looks to me like this message could be easily parsed and reassembled in what ever order the reader desires. This would have the effect of reordering a message that has top and bottom posts and reassembling them in order, either forward or reverse. (I said it fist) I volunteer to be a beta tester. Jim Velguth PS. OH! I consider the bottom posters as the inconsiderate ones. On 1/19/2011 4:11 PM, Martin Maney wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:29:14PM -0600, James Velguth wrote: >> Well we have 2 choices >> >> 1) we open the email and the message is already at the top of the >> message and also at the top is the most current part of the message IE: >> top post >> >> 2) we open the email and the message is already at the bottom of the >> message and also at the bottom is the most current part of the message. >> This is not likely because email does not open at the bottom. > Now, see, this is just not how it works. Oh, I'm sure there are emails > in that style out there, but they're from people every bit as lazy and > inconsiderate of others as the top posters. :-/ > > The choice you ignore, even though it's still very common in every list > I'm hooked up to, the *good* choice, is to keep the important part of > the old message(s) and append one's pithy thoughts in that context. If > that makes it hard for some nitwit with an inadequate display because > my first words don't appear out of context at the top when he opens it, > well, I don't much care for the sorts of replies such folks usually > write. They are who Twitter was meant for. > -- Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni