Re: LUNI: source for cheap used computers
Jared Moore <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:47:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.luni.tech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:16, <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > I've never run virtualziation on X86, only on mainframes, so if I list > VMWare or Xen, it's just because those are names I've heard bandied about. > When I get the hardware, then I;ll worry about which software to use. I > also want a TRS-80 emulator, as that was my first love.... > Perhaps you should take a look at a few of these articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervisor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_virtualization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravirtualization As was suggested, you can run a full virtualization hypervisor, i.e. VirtualBox, which is basically a layer of software that acts like hardware with or without a CPU that has Intel VT-x or AMD-V CPU virtualization extensions. I don't care, but I believe, that if you run windows under virtualbox, then > technically Bill Gates can "sue you and take your house, your car and your > wife" (that was what my business law teacher always said), because I believe > the legalize you agreed to promised you would not disassemble their code, > and VB does that. > MS licensing doesn't work that way. Typically, if you own a copy of the software, you are free to run it in a virtual machine. You can read the EULA yourself and find the terms. See the following website to find the EULA for any MS product: http://www.microsoft.com/About/Legal/EN/US/IntellectualProperty/UseTerms/Default.aspx This happens to be the terms for Windows 7 Home Premium edition, which makes it very clear that you can run the software virtualized inside of VirtualBox. d. Use with Virtualization Technologies. Instead of using the software directly on the licensed computer, you may install and use the software within only one virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system on the licensed computer. When used in a virtualized environment, content protected by digital rights management technology, BitLocker or any full volume disk drive encryption technology may not be as secure as protected content not in a virtualized environment. You should comply with all domestic and international laws that apply to such protected content ... > The mainframes I used have/had a very slick, foolproof virtualization > scheme, such that one other mainframe operating system actually ran FASTER > (under many workloads) under virtualization than natively. And you could > next virtual levels of the main virtualiztion operating system many levels > deep. Can you run windows under virtual box, under virtual box, under > virtual box, under virtual box, on the hardware? > > You can run a hypervisor inside of a hypervisor. You won't get the same performance on your PC as running VM on a multi-million dollar mainframe, but it is still pretty cool feat. http://www.vladan.fr/how-to-install-esxi-4-1-inside-of-vmware-workstation-7-1/ http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=20589&start=30#p181072 http://www.vcritical.com/2009/05/vmware-esx-4-can-even-virtualize-itself/ http://rajeev.name/2008/04/14/esx-35-inside-of-a-virtual-machine/ Jared More -- Linux Users Of Northern Illinois (Chicago) - Technical Discussion http://luni.org/mailman/listinfo/luni