Re: Version control
Daniel Pittman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.slug.chat |
|---|---|
| Organization | I know I put it down here, somewhere. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Erik de Castro Lopo <[email protected]> writes: > Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> You seem to consider arch and git to be bad choices. What do you >> suggest people use, then, and why? > > As I see it: > > Arch was the first DVCS I heard about and used. It did have a horrible > UI. Some of the people who worked on Arch went on to work on Bzr > with the express intention of providing DVCS features without the > horrible Arch UI. The primary goal of the Bzr people was usability. > > The people who developed Git came from Bitkeeper (something I have > never used). Their primary goals were technical ones, in particular > speed. The UI started out horrible and has become less horrible > over time. Yeah, I pretty much agree with you. I was curious about what "invisible ink" had to say on the topic more than you, since you justified your position fairly effectively and offered positive advice also. :) Regards, Daniel -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html