Re: ADSL provisioning Q

"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.slug.chat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, July 28, 2009 9:22 am, Andrew Perry wrote:
> I think this is definitely an issue you should take up with both the
> gaining and losing service providers, particularly if it was a "fast churn"
> type migration, as the losing service provider would be notified of the
> loss.  Even if it is not "fast churn", if the ADSL connection was on the
> same line, then the losing service provider should know their service has
> been terminated.

Andrew, thanks

that's exactly my point to the former provider, you should have been aware
service is no longer used

> You should check your contract with the losing service provider to see
> what notice obligations you have under that and whether they comply with
> applicable industry codes (eg
> http://www.commsalliance.com.au/Documents/consumers).  It would be worth
> checking your contract with the gaining service provider while you are at
> it, and their website, regarding what representations they make about
> notifying the losing service provider.

well, I was approached by them with 'leave it to us, we'll do it all for you'

nonetheless, as much as they might have failed to notify former provider,
I still think it's not reasonable for former provider to keep billing my
card


> Ultimately the cost of pursuing them may not be worth it,

ofcourse it's not, after all, it's like 39.95 x 3 or something like that
but I got annoyed they way the former provider dealt with it.

just the same, it goes both ways, it can't be worth their time, either


-- 
Voytek

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.