Re: ADSL provisioning Q
"Voytek Eymont" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.slug.chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, July 28, 2009 9:22 am, Andrew Perry wrote: > I think this is definitely an issue you should take up with both the > gaining and losing service providers, particularly if it was a "fast churn" > type migration, as the losing service provider would be notified of the > loss. Even if it is not "fast churn", if the ADSL connection was on the > same line, then the losing service provider should know their service has > been terminated. Andrew, thanks that's exactly my point to the former provider, you should have been aware service is no longer used > You should check your contract with the losing service provider to see > what notice obligations you have under that and whether they comply with > applicable industry codes (eg > http://www.commsalliance.com.au/Documents/consumers). It would be worth > checking your contract with the gaining service provider while you are at > it, and their website, regarding what representations they make about > notifying the losing service provider. well, I was approached by them with 'leave it to us, we'll do it all for you' nonetheless, as much as they might have failed to notify former provider, I still think it's not reasonable for former provider to keep billing my card > Ultimately the cost of pursuing them may not be worth it, ofcourse it's not, after all, it's like 39.95 x 3 or something like that but I got annoyed they way the former provider dealt with it. just the same, it goes both ways, it can't be worth their time, either -- Voytek -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html