Re: [activities] Re: Introducing... iSLUG 2.0!

I used to wonder why posts on SLUG had died down so much...

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Robert Collins
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 09:40 +1100, Scott Finneran wrote:
> > Perhaps it's consumer backlash against the product name. You should deny
> that you were trying to
> > stir up controversy, adopt a more conventional branding and post again.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> > > I haven't had any responses to this offer. We are making an attempt to
> > > increase community participation in SLUG, but if nobody is interested
> > > then we could just scrap the idea.
>
> *I don't think the activities list is a sufficient forum for this.
> Consider:
> - twittering
> - sending to one of the linux-australia lists
> - directly contacting some of the SIG's around that are perhaps having
> attendance issues - though finding them will be tricky. Possible groups
> are sypy, smug, ubuntu-* in sydney etc
>
> -Rob
> *
> --
> SLUG Activities
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>

-- 
SLUG Activities
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html