Re: [activities] Re: Introducing... iSLUG 2.0!

Marghanita da Cruz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.slug.festivities
Organization Ramin Communications
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Blindraven wrote:
> I think the BoF group is an excellent idea, but a BoF at the Google 
> venue seems annoying. Something localised would be better, but I guess 
> it's up to people as individuals to do that?

IMHO the Friday night SLUG meetings are 
a bit full on.
Maybe moving onto different venues (ie 
pizza/pubs/restaurants) for BoFs could 
work...or maybe I am suggesting a mobile 
linux BoF?

> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     2009/10/14 Robert Collins <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>      > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 09:40 +1100, Scott Finneran wrote:
>      >> Perhaps it's consumer backlash against the product name. You
>     should deny that you were trying to
>      >> stir up controversy, adopt a more conventional branding and post
>     again.
>      >>
>      >> Scott
>      >>
>      >> Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
>      >> > I haven't had any responses to this offer. We are making an
>     attempt to
>      >> > increase community participation in SLUG, but if nobody is
>     interested
>      >> > then we could just scrap the idea.
>      >
>      > I don't think the activities list is a sufficient forum for this.
>      > Consider:
>      > - twittering
>      > - sending to one of the linux-australia lists
>      > - directly contacting some of the SIG's around that are perhaps
>     having
>      > attendance issues - though finding them will be tricky. Possible
>     groups
>      > are sypy, smug, ubuntu-* in sydney etc
>      >
>      > -Rob
> 
>     I wanted to start by soliciting our more involved supporters.
>     Presumably if someone is subscribed to Activities then they're
>     interested in how SLUG is run. I have had better luck from approaching
>     people and groups directly, so this exercise is far from a failure.
> 
>     I must admit, though, that I didn't expect the response on SLUG's own
>     Activities list to be so subdued. We have some community members who
>     do far more than their fair share (Rob is a stellar example), but
>     outside of that small group I'm seeing contribution diminish with
>     time. Our BoFs idea is an effort to reverse that trend.
> 
> 
>     --
>     Bring choice back to your computer.
>     http://www.linux.org.au/linux
>     --
>     SLUG Activities
>     Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
> 
> 


-- 
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202


-- 
SLUG Activities
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.