Re: [activities] Nomination: James Polley for President

Sridhar Dhanapalan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.user-groups.slug.festivities
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Seconded.

While potentially controversial, James and I are in agreement that
SLUG needs greater focus. We have tried numerous experiments in recent
years, including more end-user oriented talks and sessions, BoFs and
the like. While not unsuccessful, the side effect has been that we
have attracted a diverse range of participants. We are now in a
position where it is difficult to please everyone.

I have already indicated that I am not standing again for President,
and I can think of no better person to take on this challenge than our
current Vice President.

Sridhar



On 16 March 2010 00:04, James Polley <[email protected]> wrote:
> SLUG just doesn't make sense any more. We don't gather because we're Linux
> users any more; Linux has been wildly successful and using it is no longer
> remarkable. We gather instead for a variety of other reasons. We have people
> who aren't hugely interested in the philosophy behind Open Source, but want
> to know is how to make videos of their children using tools they can afford.
> We have people who don't care about the fiscal cost, but who feel that the
> cost to society if we lose sight of the ideals behind the Open Source
> movement would be too great. We have people who understand what Open Source
> and Open Standards are and why they matter, and who can make informed
> choices about what they lose (and what they gain) by using systems that
> aren't open, while most of the world doesn't have a clear understanding. We
> even have people whose main focus is Open Government - perhaps not directly
> related, but sharing many of the same goals and ideals.
>
> I do believe there's a place for an organisation very much like SLUG, I just
> don't think it makes any sense for that organisation to be called the Sydney
> Linux Users Group; nor do I feel that SLUG, as it currently exists,
> adequately serves the needs of the people I've just talked about. SLUG is
> slowly dying a natural death; I want to be President so I can help ease the
> suffering and pain and ensure that its death is swift, painless, and serves
> a purpose.
>
> Obviously I'm not just going to disband SLUG after the election - even if I
> wanted to, making such a change would require a majority vote at a General
> Meeting, and those require weeks of notice before they can be called.
>
> What I propose is that the newly elected committee should immediately start
> investigating options for reinventing - everything from adopting a new
> trading name to better reflect the goals of the current membership, to
> completely winding up the organisation and handing all assets to LA, on the
> understanding that they'll form a sub-committee charged with continuing to
> hold monthly meetings along the lines of the existing SLUG meetings.
>
> A vital part of this will be finding out what *you*, the current membership,
> want from SLUG. Should we continue to have Linux in the name, or should we
> have Libre or Open Source in their somewhere? Should we continue to be an
> organisation largely focused on user group meetings, or should we try for a
> broader advocacy role? Should we continue having monthly meetings - or
> should we go for more frequent, smaller meetings? Less frequent larger
> meetings? Perhaps we should stop holding meetings directly, and turn into an
> umbrella organisation that assists lots of smaller user groups to hold their
> own regular meetings.
>
> If you're interested in working on this with me, I encourage you to stand
> for election alongside me. Even if you don't want to do that - I need a
> seconder!
>
> If you abhor the idea of even investigating making changes to SLUG, I
> encourage you to stand for election against me. There will be plenty of
> opportunity to prevent me from doing any damage after the election, but if
> the majority of people don't support the idea of making changes to SLUG, it
> will be better for everyone if I get defeated quickly. Remember: if I run
> unopposed, you don't even get to vote against me.
>
> Either way, please be sure to come to the AGM - Friday 27th March, from 6pm.
> Pay your $25 (less for students and other concession holders) - you'll get
> the right to vote AND you're helping to ensure SLUG's future - whatever that
> happens to be - is secure and funded.
>
> --
> SLUG Activities
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
>




-- 
Bring choice back to your computer.
http://www.linux.org.au/linux
-- 
SLUG Activities
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.