Re: [activities] Nomination: James Polley for President
Sridhar Dhanapalan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.slug.festivities |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Seconded. While potentially controversial, James and I are in agreement that SLUG needs greater focus. We have tried numerous experiments in recent years, including more end-user oriented talks and sessions, BoFs and the like. While not unsuccessful, the side effect has been that we have attracted a diverse range of participants. We are now in a position where it is difficult to please everyone. I have already indicated that I am not standing again for President, and I can think of no better person to take on this challenge than our current Vice President. Sridhar On 16 March 2010 00:04, James Polley <[email protected]> wrote: > SLUG just doesn't make sense any more. We don't gather because we're Linux > users any more; Linux has been wildly successful and using it is no longer > remarkable. We gather instead for a variety of other reasons. We have people > who aren't hugely interested in the philosophy behind Open Source, but want > to know is how to make videos of their children using tools they can afford. > We have people who don't care about the fiscal cost, but who feel that the > cost to society if we lose sight of the ideals behind the Open Source > movement would be too great. We have people who understand what Open Source > and Open Standards are and why they matter, and who can make informed > choices about what they lose (and what they gain) by using systems that > aren't open, while most of the world doesn't have a clear understanding. We > even have people whose main focus is Open Government - perhaps not directly > related, but sharing many of the same goals and ideals. > > I do believe there's a place for an organisation very much like SLUG, I just > don't think it makes any sense for that organisation to be called the Sydney > Linux Users Group; nor do I feel that SLUG, as it currently exists, > adequately serves the needs of the people I've just talked about. SLUG is > slowly dying a natural death; I want to be President so I can help ease the > suffering and pain and ensure that its death is swift, painless, and serves > a purpose. > > Obviously I'm not just going to disband SLUG after the election - even if I > wanted to, making such a change would require a majority vote at a General > Meeting, and those require weeks of notice before they can be called. > > What I propose is that the newly elected committee should immediately start > investigating options for reinventing - everything from adopting a new > trading name to better reflect the goals of the current membership, to > completely winding up the organisation and handing all assets to LA, on the > understanding that they'll form a sub-committee charged with continuing to > hold monthly meetings along the lines of the existing SLUG meetings. > > A vital part of this will be finding out what *you*, the current membership, > want from SLUG. Should we continue to have Linux in the name, or should we > have Libre or Open Source in their somewhere? Should we continue to be an > organisation largely focused on user group meetings, or should we try for a > broader advocacy role? Should we continue having monthly meetings - or > should we go for more frequent, smaller meetings? Less frequent larger > meetings? Perhaps we should stop holding meetings directly, and turn into an > umbrella organisation that assists lots of smaller user groups to hold their > own regular meetings. > > If you're interested in working on this with me, I encourage you to stand > for election alongside me. Even if you don't want to do that - I need a > seconder! > > If you abhor the idea of even investigating making changes to SLUG, I > encourage you to stand for election against me. There will be plenty of > opportunity to prevent me from doing any damage after the election, but if > the majority of people don't support the idea of making changes to SLUG, it > will be better for everyone if I get defeated quickly. Remember: if I run > unopposed, you don't even get to vote against me. > > Either way, please be sure to come to the AGM - Friday 27th March, from 6pm. > Pay your $25 (less for students and other concession holders) - you'll get > the right to vote AND you're helping to ensure SLUG's future - whatever that > happens to be - is secure and funded. > > -- > SLUG Activities > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- Bring choice back to your computer. http://www.linux.org.au/linux -- SLUG Activities Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html