Re: JUnit 4 or TestNG?
"Mocky Habeeb" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.user-groups.trijug.juglist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've used both and I have my preference, but it smells like holy war to me too :) They both are pretty straight forward and both will get the job done. There are a lot of debates on this topic to be found out there already. In any case if you pick one and don't like it later, you won't be killing yourself to switch, since you'll already have a set of tests to run as you make the conversion. -- Regards, Mocky Habeeb On Jan 17, 2008 10:25 PM, Tom Roche <[email protected]> wrote: > > Phillip Rhodes Jan 17, 2008 8:17 PM > > Has JUnit caught up to TestNG? > > Mmm ... smells like holy war !-) Seriously, I think > > * you'll find you get forced into one or another by API that you want > to use. E.g. you want to test foo's and the FooTronic package only > supports one, or your IDE only supports one (well), etc. > > * ultracoolth accrues to supporting both. I believe that's the > direction FEST is trying to go, but I've been outta that space for > awhile. Check Alex's blog @ > > http://www.jroller.com/alexRuiz/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Juglist mailing list > [email protected] > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org > _______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [email protected] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org