Re: JUnit 4 or TestNG?

Mocky Habeeb wrote:
> I've used both and I have my preference, but it smells like holy war to 
> me too :)

/me listens to "Holy War...The Punishment Due" by Megadeth and tries
to incite a flame war on a Java mailing list...

:-)

All joking aside, I'm just interested in hearing reasons why people
favor one or the other.  At one time I know TestNG had some 
functionality that JUnit 3.8.x lacked but I haven't heard much
about what advances were made when they went to JUnit 4.x.

OTOH, TestNG was also formerly capable of running JUnit tests, and
if that's still true then I guess it doesn't matter much.  Even
more so if the inverse is true. :-)  Time to do some research...


TTYL,

-- 
Phillip Rhodes
Chief Architect - OpenQabal
https://openqabal.dev.java.net

_______________________________________________
Juglist mailing list
[email protected]
http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org

begin:vcard
fn:Phillip Rhodes
n:Rhodes;Phillip
adr:;;P.O. Box 16905;Chapel Hill;NC;27516;USA
email;internet:[email protected]
tel;home:919-928-0236
url:http://www.linkedin.com/in/philliprhodes
version:2.1
end:vcard