Re: pregunta sobre compatibilidad GPL

On Mar, 27 de Septiembre de 2005, 6:28 pm, Guillermo Lapresta dijo:

> Buenas, no se si =E9sta es la lista m=E1s indicada para preguntar =E9st=
o pero
> me ha surgido una duda y se que aqu=ED hay gente que sabe mucho sobre e=
l
> tema.
>
> Como PFC he desarrollado un software que deseo liberar bajo GPL. Pero
> no se si voy a poder porque me he basado en c=F3digo fuente que incluye
> =E9sto en las cabeceras:
>
> /*
>   Copyright (c) 2002-2003, Kurt Revis.  All rights reserved.
>
>   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
> met:
>
>   * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>   * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>   * Neither the name of Snoize nor the names of its contributors may be
> used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
> specific prior written permission.
>
>   THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A
> PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>   */
>
> =BFPuedo licenciar entonces mi software con GPL? No se si la
> "minilicencia" de =E9ste programa es compatible con ella, y en caso
> positivo, no se qu=E9 deber=EDa poner en las cabeceras de =E9stos fiche=
ros:
> =BFMi nota de copyright con la referencia a la GPL y debajo =E9sto? =BF=
S=F3lo
> la nota que el autor original requiere?

Hola Guillermo,
la licencia que utiliza Kurt Revis es del estilo de la BSD modificada (si=
n
la cl=E1usula de publicidad).

Es una licencia de software libre, compatible con la GNU GPL.
    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ModifiedBSD

Salud,
 Quique


--=20
Pobres, lo que se dice pobres,
son los que no tienen tiempo para perder el tiempo.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Lista de correo de zaralinux-asoc
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zaralinux-asoc