Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace

David Poehlman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general
Organization Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
Message-ID <011c01c2cc7d$2640e280$6501a8c0@handsontech>
and if I cannot hover?

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Foliot - bytown internet" <[email protected]>
To: "Scarlett Julian (ED)" <[email protected]>; "'Steve
Vosloo'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace



uh-huh, especially since the user will in fact choose one of the 5 links
(presumably).  Visual display vs logical structure.

Links to "this", "that" or "the other" are, semantically, an unordered list;
it doesn't matter which order you approach them, only that they are equal in
importance.  I have an associate who has been playing with nested lists as
"dynamic menus", where hovering over a list item "reveals" the secondary
nested list, place and styled via CSS.

JF


>
> I'm not sure I see the distinction. What is it about footer links
> that makes
> them different?
>
> Forgive me if I've misunderstood but what John is saying is that
> a bunch of
> links can be thought of structurally (and thus marked up) as a
> list. Whether
> that list is layed out vertically or horizontally, or in a
> left-hand menu or
> in a footer is besides the point.
>
> --Julian
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Vosloo [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:41 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: 'W3c-Wai-Ig'
> > Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
> >
> >
> >
> > What I'm offering isn't a list, it's a series of footer links
> > (e.g. not
> > "Choose from this list of 5 links:")
> >
> > I see what you're suggesting, but I think if I had to go for strict
> > adherence then wrapping the vertical links in square brackets
> > might be a
> > more suitable solution.
> >
> >
> The information in this email is confidential. The contents may
> not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If
> you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply
> facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield
> City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or
> completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a
> public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been
> intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.