RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace
"John Foliot - bytown internet" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
onfocus (besides, I said "playing"...) no samples for public view. JF > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of David Poehlman > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:41 PM > To: John Foliot - bytown internet; Scarlett Julian (ED); 'Steve Vosloo'; > [email protected] > Cc: 'W3c-Wai-Ig' > Subject: Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace > > > > and if I cannot hover? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Foliot - bytown internet" <[email protected]> > To: "Scarlett Julian (ED)" <[email protected]>; "'Steve > Vosloo'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Cc: "'W3c-Wai-Ig'" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:27 PM > Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace > > > > uh-huh, especially since the user will in fact choose one of the 5 links > (presumably). Visual display vs logical structure. > > Links to "this", "that" or "the other" are, semantically, an > unordered list; > it doesn't matter which order you approach them, only that they > are equal in > importance. I have an associate who has been playing with nested lists as > "dynamic menus", where hovering over a list item "reveals" the secondary > nested list, place and styled via CSS. > > JF > > > > > > I'm not sure I see the distinction. What is it about footer links > > that makes > > them different? > > > > Forgive me if I've misunderstood but what John is saying is that > > a bunch of > > links can be thought of structurally (and thus marked up) as a > > list. Whether > > that list is layed out vertically or horizontally, or in a > > left-hand menu or > > in a footer is besides the point. > > > > --Julian > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steve Vosloo [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:41 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: 'W3c-Wai-Ig' > > > Subject: RE: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace > > > > > > > > > > > > What I'm offering isn't a list, it's a series of footer links > > > (e.g. not > > > "Choose from this list of 5 links:") > > > > > > I see what you're suggesting, but I think if I had to go for strict > > > adherence then wrapping the vertical links in square brackets > > > might be a > > > more suitable solution. > > > > > > > > The information in this email is confidential. The contents may > > not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If > > you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply > > facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield > > City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or > > completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a > > public network. If you suspect that the message may have been > > intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible. > > > > > > > > > > >