Re: Numbering Success Criteria
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:26:27 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.guidelines |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <016101c29fc1$411847d0$0100a8c0@NBRSIWA> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Roberts" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:20 PM Subject: RE: Numbering Success Criteria > > I think option 3 serves best because it removes the confusion presented > in the other options. It definitely made sense to me where the other > options only added confusion when scanning. Yes.. i think also this... i have evalutate option 4 but using the letter inside it becomes "not standard".. .an user could have problems to resolve 1.1a knowing that a means Level 1...