Re: Numbering Success Criteria

Marja-Riitta Koivunen <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:42:47 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.guidelines
Message-ID <5.1.0.14.0.20021209153620.03912830@localhost>
I'm still not convinced we want to do the levels for each checkpoint and if 
all levels exists for all checkpoints (e.g. can some checkpoints have no 
level 1?).

But if you want to number them why not just use 1.1.level1 or 
1.1.level2.1  or shorter 1.1.l1 and 1.1.l2.1? Or something else that spells 
out what the parts of the number are.

Marja