Re: The 'speech' media type
Jordan Clark <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.validator.css |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for that, Dan. However, what I really wanted to know is which media type – 'aural' or 'speech' – to use in the interim, until the CSS3 Speech Module (hopefully!) gets more widespread support among UAs and reaches Recommendation status. I just find the wording of the current standard a bit confusing, as it is basically ruling out *both* media types (for the present time at least): “This means that a style sheet such as ['speech' example code] is valid, but that its meaning is not defined by CSS 2.1, while ['aural' example code] is deprecated, but defined by this appendix.” -- CSS 2.1 Specification http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/aural.html#aural-media-group (Perhaps I should really have sent this question to the more general CSS mailing list over at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style .) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jordan Clark Website: http://www.jdclark.org E-mail: [email protected]