Re: The 'speech' media type
Yves Lafon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.w3c.validator.css |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Jordan Clark wrote: > > Thanks for that, Dan. However, what I really wanted to know is which media type ? 'aural' or 'speech' ? to use in the interim, until the CSS3 Speech Module (hopefully!) gets more widespread support among UAs and reaches Recommendation status. > > I just find the wording of the current standard a bit confusing, as it is basically ruling out *both* media types (for the present time at least): > > ?This means that a style sheet such as ['speech' example code] is valid, but that its meaning is not defined by CSS 2.1, while ['aural' example code] is deprecated, but defined by this appendix.? > -- CSS 2.1 Specification > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/aural.html#aural-media-group > > (Perhaps I should really have sent this question to the more general CSS > mailing list over at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style .) Yes, that would be better to reach to a broader mailing list like www-style. In the meantime, I will downgrade the 'error' to a 'warning' as it makes more sense in the css validator (in fact, the validation continues on what's inside the @media definition, so warning is definitely the best). Thanks, > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Jordan Clark > > Website: http://www.jdclark.org > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves