Re: Failed: phase compiling: caca-0.99.beta19-5 failed

Sorry, but I did not understand. What will happen now? 
I there something I have to do, or will there be some new update? 
I have updated textlive with the last texlive-20210325-6, but caca-0.99.beta19-5 keeps failing. 

Thanks 

	Giuliano



> On 16. Feb 2022, at 17:45, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> On 2022-02-16 06:35, Daniel Macks wrote:
>> On 2/16/22, 7:30 AM, "Hanspeter Niederstrasser" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>    On 2/15/22 3:45 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
>>    > Sorry,
>>    >
>>    > It’s not fs, it’s the new texlive, the pdf creation is failing,
>> this isn’t a bug in caca it’s in texlive.
>>    >
>>    > I can’t even install the new texlive so I can’t even test this.
>>    >
>>    > - Justin
>>    >
>>    >> On Feb 15, 2022, at 2:24 PM, Franchetti, Giuliano Dr.
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>    >>
>>    >> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.22 (TeX Live
>> 2021/Fink 20210325-6) (preloaded format=pdflatex)
>>    >> restricted \write18 enabled.
>>    >> entering extended mode
>>    >> (./refman.tex
>>    >> LaTeX2e <2020-10-01> patch level 4
>>    >> L3 programming layer <2021-02-18>
>>    >> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.22 (TeX Live
>> 2021/Fink 20210325-6) (preloaded format=pdflatex)
>>    >> restricted \write18 enabled.
>>    >> entering extended mode
>>    >> (./refman.tex
>>    >> LaTeX2e <2020-10-01> patch level 4
>>    >> L3 programming layer <2021-02-18>
>>    >> pdflatex exit code: 1
>>    >> mv latex/refman.pdf latex/libcaca.pdf
>>    >> mv: rename latex/refman.pdf to latex/libcaca.pdf: No such file
>> or directory
>>    >> make[2]: *** [stamp-latex] Error 1
>>    >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>    Looks like caca 0.99beta19 is ancient (from 2013) and that breaks with
>>    the texlive2021. Upstream actually released a new version beta20 in
>>    October 2021 (almost as good a release cycle as us) that claims to fix a
>>    latex documentation hack from 2004:
>>    [1] https://github.com/cacalabs/libcaca/tags
>>    [2]
>> https://github.com/cacalabs/libcaca/commit/b7d7a7a35c7d0f737494c04bc68e51358a784de7
>>    I tried it and it actually starts building the PDF, but the pdfTeX
>>    output has lots of errors about missing marks
>>    > l.64 \end{longtabu}
>>    >
>>    > I can't figure out why you would want to use a tab mark
>>    > or \cr or \span just now. If something like a right brace
>>    > up above has ended a previous alignment prematurely,
>>    > you're probably due for more error messages, and you
>>    > might try typing `S' now just to see what is salvageable.
> 
>> Debian is still at 0.9.beta19 and they have a different patch to that
>> makefile recipe:
>> https://sources.debian.org/patches/libcaca/0.99.beta19-2.2/100_doxygen.diff
> 
> We already have that in our caca-doxygen.patch. And unfortunately, removing it causes a failure similar to the one I saw in unpatched beta20 (too many missing tags).
> 
> Until a fix is found, we can use `--disable-doc` to work around the problem.
> 
> Hanspeter


_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-users/
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users