Re: dill-py310 does not install

On 9/26/24 12:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On 2024-09-26 07:18, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote:
>>> On Sep 26, 2024, at 6:15 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/25/24 1:29 PM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 25, 2024, at 1:13 PM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 25, 2024, at 05:14, Hanspeter Niederstrasser 
>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/23/24 9:23 PM, Scott Hannahs via Fink-users wrote:
>>>>>>> It seems to build fine, but there is an install error.  Have 
>>>>>>> rebuilt the package, but there is an issue with “alternatives”?? 
>>>>>>> I was trying to update pytlint but this is one of the dependencies.
>>>>>>> Preparing to unpack .../dill-py310_0.3.8-1_darwin-x86_64.deb ...
>>>>>>> Unpacking dill-py310 (0.3.8-1) over (0.3.8-1) ...
>>>>>>> Setting up dill-py310 (0.3.8-1) ...
>>>>>>> update-alternatives: error: alternative path 
>>>>>>> /opt/sw/bin/dill-py3.10 doesn't exist
>>>>>>> dpkg: error processing package dill-py310 (--install):
>>>>>>> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
>>>>>>> status 2
>>>>>>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>>>>>>> dill-py310
>>>>>>> ### execution of /opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1
>>>>>>> Failed: can't install package dill-py310-0.3.8-1
>>>>>>> I think he dot-info file creates that file so I am not sure why 
>>>>>>> it does not exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixed. update-alternatives was looking for dill-pyX.YZ when it 
>>>>>> should have been undill-pyX.YZ.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hanspeter
>>>>>
>>>>> Hanspeter,
>>>>> Thanks, I would never have found the difference between dill and 
>>>>> undill!
>>>>>
>>>>> -Scott
>>>> Spoke too soon, tried to update dill (dependency from pylint?)
>>>> There is still a problem with the alternatives?
>>>> Preparing to unpack .../dill-py310_0.3.8-2_darwin-x86_64.deb ...
>>>> update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for dill
>>>> dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit 
>>>> status 2
>>>> dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ...
>>>> update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for dill
>>>> dpkg: error processing archive 
>>>> /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/libs/pythonmods/dill-py310_0.3.8-2_darwin-x86_64.deb (--install):
>>>>  subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 2
>>>> update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for dill
>>>> dpkg: error while cleaning up:
>>>>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
>>>> status 2
>>>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>>>>
>>>> /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/libs/pythonmods/dill-py310_0.3.8-2_darwin-x86_64.deb
>>>> ### execution of /opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1
>>>> Failed: can't install package dill-py310-0.3.8-2
>>>
>>> Ugh. The new u-a is stricter and errors out. If you edit the file 
>>> /opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/pythonmods/dill-py.info 
>>> so that in both PostInstScript() and PreRmScript(), the
>>> `update-alternatives --auto dill` command (lines 40 and 51) is inside 
>>> the `if [ -f %p/bin/dill-py ]; then` conditional, does that work? Run 
>>> `fink rebuild dill-py38; fink reinstall dill-py38`
>>>
>>> The conditional should now look like this (all else in those scripts 
>>> stay the same:
>>>
>>> if [ -f %p/bin/dill-py ]; then
>>>     update-alternatives --auto dill
>>>     update-alternatives --verbose --remove dill 
>>> %p/bin/dill-py%type_raw[python]
>>> fi
>>>
>>> Hanspeter
>>
>> Ugh indeed.  So I made those modifications but doesn’t this script now
>> remove the executable dill while creating undill and undill-py310 as a
>> hard linked file? It seems to only check for the un-versioned
>> executable %p/bin/dill-py.
>> There is no dill or dill-py310 installed.
>>
>> May not be able to do more testing for awhile.  Have a hurricane
>> coming in and will lose power soon.
> 
> You're right that the conditional is broken because it's looking for 
> something that never existed. D'oh. I'll play with this some more.

I pushed revision -3. Hopefully this works for everyone.

Hanspeter



_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-users/
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users