Re: Retiring lpr and lpd
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:39:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.architechture |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFYkXjnK-ZR8Y2y4zNfEXrFEOnPzK_oE7aBG6iyBf4dFHGjvtg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 6:42 AM Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 04:47:55 +0100 > Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 3:42 AM Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (..) > > > Would it be possible to move them to ports? Anyone using them would > > > still use but from ports :-) Or some working alternatives (plp seems > > > dead) maybe in ports already? :-) > > > > https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/LPRng seems to be replacement / > > alternative (note capital LPR). > > License: ART10 GPLv2 > ~~~~~ > > And depends on GPL'ed things. > This would mean BSD compatibully licensed alternatives for GPL'ed > dependencies and GPL'ed part are needed to be in base. Uh, like cups, maybe not a problem for users but definitely a problem for vendors. Looks like a fix for *BSD lpd is needed to stay in base, or move to ports, or removal until someone can do the job? Looks like a task for vendor who cares about lpr/lpd :-P -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info