Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] vs. to 0x1f0000 (size 0xbd90) [works]?
Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2020-Oct-11, at 12:46, Klaus Cucinauomo <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 11.10.2020 um 21:37 schrieb Mark Millard <[email protected]>: >> >> MESS:00:00:20.241899:0: brfs: File read: /mfs/sd/armstub8-gic.bin >> MESS:00:00:20.244930:0: Loading 'armstub8-gic.bin' to 0x0 size 0x1700 > > > You have to DELETE the armstub from the MSDOS-partition, > it loads automatically if available. What I was replying to had nothing to do with investigations of deleting or otherwise avoiding armstub8-gic.bin . It was about why something like "device_tree_address=0x4000" is needed when something like armstub8-gic.bin is in use. I'm not currently working on your direction of avoiding armstub8-gic.bin . By the way, the naming conventions involved in finding armstub*.bin's allow the file to be renamed in order to not be found, instead of having to delete the file. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"