Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] vs. to 0x1f0000 (size 0xbd90) [works]?
Klaus Cucinauomo via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Am 11.10.2020 um 22:21 schrieb Mark Millard <[email protected]>: > > It was about why something like "device_tree_address=0x4000" is > needed when something like armstub8-gic.bin is in use. > ....the naming conventions involved in finding armstub*.bin'sallow the file to be renamed in order to not be found,instead ofhaving to delete the file. As also Rob proved in a previous post afaik, The latest rpi-FW is bootable even if the complete device_tree_address -line is DELETED :-) Ha Ha or to say : outcommented, if you like that more… K. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"