Re: device-tree on BeagleBone Black (enabling UART)

On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 01:00 +0100, Kristoff wrote:
> Hi Ian, Daniel,
> 
> 
> I am sorry for the late reply.
> (inline comments)
> 
> 
> On 8/02/2021 9:41 p.m., Ian Lepore wrote:
> > 
> > > I am running FreeBSD 12.1 on a beaglebone black. As I want to use
> > > it
> > > for
> > > a time-server (i.e. connect it to a GPS), I want to enable an
> > > additional
> > > UART (and also a pps gpio-pin, I guess).
> 
> Good news! I managed to get the uart working.
> To get to the same configuration as Daniel, I upgraded to FreeBSD
> 13.0, 
> and that seams to have done the trick.
> 
> Uart1 has been created with a device-tree overlay-file and I can use
> it 
> on the device.
> 
> 
> Question, what is the difference between /dev/cuau0 and /dev/ttyu0,
> and 
> which one do I use for what?
> 

ttyu0 is the "call-in" device, and cuau0 is teh "call-out" device.  The
difference is that when you call open on a call-in device, the open
call blocks until the carrier-detect signal on the tty goes active
(presumably signaling that a modem has answered and connected).  With
the call-out device, the blocking doesn't happen.

> > The beaglebone has a special pps driver that uses the am335x chip's
> > timer hardware to measure the pps pulse time with better accuracy
> > than
> > the generic gpio-pps driver.  To use it, add
> > 
> >    am335x_dmtpps_load=YES
> 
> At the same time I also wanted to try the pps driver you mention.
> 
> However, it does not seams to load.
> 
> I get this:
> 
> [root@black1 ~]# kldload am335x_dmtpps
> kldload: can't load am335x_dmtpps: No such file or directory
> 
> 
> The issue seams to be this:
> 
> # dmesg
> (...)
> KLD am335x_dmtpps.ko: depends on ti_sysc - not available or version
> mismatch
> 
> Looking on my system, I seems to have the source of 'to_sysc', but
> not 
> the .ko.
> [root@black1 ~]# locate ti_sysc
> /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/ti_sysc.c
> /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/ti_sysc.h
> 
> 
> What is the procedure to compile one single kernel-module?
> I tried "make ti_sysc", but that failed due to compilation errors
> 
> 

Hmm, are you using the GENERIC kernel, or a custom kernel, or what? 
The ti_sysc device is a relative newcomer, and we may have neglected to
add it to the GENERIC config.  There probably isn't a makefile to build
it as a module.

So the fix for that would be to add 'device ti_sysc' to whatever kernel
config you're using and rebuild the kernel.

-- Ian

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"