Re: device-tree on BeagleBone Black (enabling UART)
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:15:49 -0700 Ian Lepore <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 01:00 +0100, Kristoff wrote: > > Hi Ian, Daniel, > > > > > > I am sorry for the late reply. > > (inline comments) > > > > > > On 8/02/2021 9:41 p.m., Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > > > I am running FreeBSD 12.1 on a beaglebone black. As I want to use > > > > it > > > > for > > > > a time-server (i.e. connect it to a GPS), I want to enable an > > > > additional > > > > UART (and also a pps gpio-pin, I guess). > > > > Good news! I managed to get the uart working. > > To get to the same configuration as Daniel, I upgraded to FreeBSD > > 13.0, > > and that seams to have done the trick. > > > > Uart1 has been created with a device-tree overlay-file and I can use > > it > > on the device. > > > > > > Question, what is the difference between /dev/cuau0 and /dev/ttyu0, > > and > > which one do I use for what? > > > > ttyu0 is the "call-in" device, and cuau0 is teh "call-out" device. The > difference is that when you call open on a call-in device, the open > call blocks until the carrier-detect signal on the tty goes active > (presumably signaling that a modem has answered and connected). With > the call-out device, the blocking doesn't happen. > > > > The beaglebone has a special pps driver that uses the am335x chip's > > > timer hardware to measure the pps pulse time with better accuracy > > > than > > > the generic gpio-pps driver. To use it, add > > > > > > am335x_dmtpps_load=YES > > > > At the same time I also wanted to try the pps driver you mention. > > > > However, it does not seams to load. > > > > I get this: > > > > [root@black1 ~]# kldload am335x_dmtpps > > kldload: can't load am335x_dmtpps: No such file or directory > > > > > > The issue seams to be this: > > > > # dmesg > > (...) > > KLD am335x_dmtpps.ko: depends on ti_sysc - not available or version > > mismatch > > > > Looking on my system, I seems to have the source of 'to_sysc', but > > not > > the .ko. > > [root@black1 ~]# locate ti_sysc > > /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/ti_sysc.c > > /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/ti_sysc.h > > > > > > What is the procedure to compile one single kernel-module? > > I tried "make ti_sysc", but that failed due to compilation errors > > > > > > Hmm, are you using the GENERIC kernel, or a custom kernel, or what? > The ti_sysc device is a relative newcomer, and we may have neglected to > add it to the GENERIC config. There probably isn't a makefile to build > it as a module. > > So the fix for that would be to add 'device ti_sysc' to whatever kernel > config you're using and rebuild the kernel. > > -- Ian There is no device ti_sysc, it's standard and should be present as long as one does "files ../ti/files.ti" in the kernel config. https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/arm/ti/files.ti#n21 -- Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"