Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock
Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <454282477.15929.1720372600841@localhost> |
I created fakertc for my rpi4. https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/ Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot. Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine. Regards, Ronald Van: bob prohaska <[email protected]> Datum: 7 juli 2024 18:01 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock > > > Just tried using ntpd with a fresh 14.1 installation on a Pi4. > Near as I can tell, ntpd reports a failure due to the clock > being off by too much, even if it's set manually to within > a minute before reboot. Probably that's caused by the lack > of a hardware clock on the Pi4, linux has a bodge called > fake-hwclock. Is there an equivalent workaround for FreeBSD? > > In the meantime ntpdate seems to work, though deprecated > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > > > > > >