Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock
Warner Losh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANCZdfrdFrCkt8VPd+nv=UpVMzqHmX2kw=7wULwZvkQnHDcAhg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 11:16 AM Ronald Klop <[email protected]> wrote: > I created fakertc for my rpi4. > > https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/ > > Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot. > > Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine. > Curious why the root mod time isn't firing... it whould alrwady do that Warner Regards, > Ronald > > *Van:* bob prohaska <[email protected]> > *Datum:* 7 juli 2024 18:01 > *Aan:* [email protected] > *Onderwerp:* ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock > > Just tried using ntpd with a fresh 14.1 installation on a Pi4. > Near as I can tell, ntpd reports a failure due to the clock > being off by too much, even if it's set manually to within > a minute before reboot. Probably that's caused by the lack > of a hardware clock on the Pi4, linux has a bodge called > fake-hwclock. Is there an equivalent workaround for FreeBSD? > > In the meantime ntpdate seems to work, though deprecated > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > > > ------------------------------ > > > > >