Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock

Warner Losh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <CANCZdfrdFrCkt8VPd+nv=UpVMzqHmX2kw=7wULwZvkQnHDcAhg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 11:16 AM Ronald Klop <[email protected]> wrote:

> I created fakertc for my rpi4.
>
> https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/
>
> Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot.
>
> Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine.
>

Curious why the root mod time isn't firing... it whould alrwady do that

Warner

Regards,
> Ronald
>
> *Van:* bob prohaska <[email protected]>
> *Datum:* 7 juli 2024 18:01
> *Aan:* [email protected]
> *Onderwerp:* ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock
>
> Just tried using ntpd with a fresh 14.1 installation on a Pi4.
> Near as I can tell, ntpd reports a failure due to the clock
> being off by too much, even if it's set manually to within
> a minute before reboot. Probably that's caused by the lack
> of a hardware clock on the Pi4, linux has a bodge called
> fake-hwclock. Is there an equivalent workaround for FreeBSD?
>
> In the meantime ntpdate seems to work, though deprecated
>
> Thanks for reading,
>
> bob prohaska
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.