Re: Packages not build for arm64/aarch64 [it has recently been roughly a month between updates for a given type of aarch64 build]
Mark Millard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just an FYI to Jack Raats: Your Email environment rejected my Email as: QUOTE (but edited for _at_) 554: 5.7.1 <marklmi_at_yahoo.com>: Sender address rejected: You are a spammer END QUOTE so any more from me will just be on-list, no direct copy to your Email address. Mark On Jul 14, 2025, at 13:38, Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote: > Jack Raats <mlist_at_jarasoft.net> wrote on > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:07:01 UTC : > >> Perhaps this is not the right mailinglist to ask this question, excusez moi. >> >> Are the packages (latest) for arm64.aarch64 not being build the last 4 weeks? > > As things are right now with pkg 2.2.1 in use, the detailed > answers are very different between main [so: 15] vs. 14.2/13.5. > The quick summary is: recently it has been about a month > between package builds completing for a given type of > aarch64 or armv7 context. > > Details follow in case you care. > > > main-arm64/main-armv7 built on ampere2: > (main [so: 15 as stands] is always latest, not quarterly) > > As stands, the build machine ampere2 cycles between building > main-arm64 and main-armv7, each of those 2 taking around > 2 weeks or somewhat more, totaling a round a month or more. > Part of this is the interval is long enough that generally > the build is a (nearly) full build instead of a more > noticeably smaller incremental build. > > The last 2 build start times and end dates > for main-arm64 are: > > Tue, 06 May 2025 02:47:25 GMT ending during May-26 > . . . main-armv7 built here . . . > Sat, 14 Jun 2025 02:48:40 GMT ending during Jun-30 > > (Note: The above does not explicitly show time for > distribution of the updates around the world.) > > So, more than a month for the interval between builds > finishing. > > No main-arm64/main-armv7 builds have started using pkg > 2.2+ yet. The next to start should be using pkg 2.2.1 . > > pkg 2.2.1 usage in future builds should help with this > some, but not greatly, an issue unique to main-* . > > > 142arm64/142releng-armv7/135arm64/143releng-armv7 on ampere3 > (these are all latest: ampere1 deals with quarterly) > > As stands, the build machine ampere3 cycles between building > each of the 4 types of latest build. Individually these > builds do not take as long as the main-* ones do. But there > are 4 builds in the cycle instead of 2 builds. > > But, these builds do do not take nearly as long and manage to > commonly be somewhat more incremental from one to the next as > well, more often than the main-* ones do. > > Using 142arm64 as the cycle boundary example sequence, > incremental builds involved: > > Fri, 30 May 2025 17:00:08 GMT ended during Jun-8 > . . . 3 other types of builds, then: . . . > Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:06:30 GMT ended during Jul-8 > > (Note: The above does not explicitly show time for > distribution of the updates around the world.) > > So, about a month for the interval between > 142arm64 builds completing, despite 4 types of > builds being done in a cycle. > > The first pkg 2.2+ based build (135arm64 using > pkg 2.2.1) started on Tue, 08 Jul 2025 03:07:25 GMT > and has under 4000 packages to go. > > Unlike for main-*, the pkg 2.2.1 usage should be a > far more noticeable improvement vs. when pkg 2.1.* > was in use. But it is going to be a while before a > full cycle of updates using 2.2.1 has completed > in order to have measurements. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com