Re: Packages not build for arm64/aarch64 [it has recently been roughly a month between updates for a given type of aarch64 build]

Mark Millard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just an FYI to Jack Raats:

Your Email environment rejected my Email as:

QUOTE (but edited for _at_)
554: 5.7.1 <marklmi_at_yahoo.com>: Sender address rejected: You are a spammer
END QUOTE

so any more from me will just be on-list, no direct copy
to your Email address.

Mark

On Jul 14, 2025, at 13:38, Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jack Raats <mlist_at_jarasoft.net> wrote on
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:07:01 UTC :
> 
>> Perhaps this is not the right mailinglist to ask this question, excusez moi.
>> 
>> Are the packages (latest) for arm64.aarch64 not being build the last 4 weeks?
> 
> As things are right now with pkg 2.2.1 in use, the detailed
> answers are very different between main [so: 15] vs. 14.2/13.5.
> The quick summary is: recently it has been about a month
> between package builds completing for a given type of
> aarch64 or armv7 context.
> 
> Details follow in case you care.
> 
> 
> main-arm64/main-armv7 built on ampere2:
> (main [so: 15 as stands] is always latest, not quarterly)
> 
> As stands, the build machine ampere2 cycles between building
> main-arm64 and main-armv7, each of those 2 taking around
> 2 weeks or somewhat more, totaling a round a month or more.
> Part of this is the interval is long enough that generally
> the build is a (nearly) full build instead of a more
> noticeably smaller incremental build.
> 
> The last 2 build start times and end dates
> for main-arm64 are:
> 
> Tue, 06 May 2025 02:47:25 GMT ending during May-26
> . . . main-armv7 built here . . .
> Sat, 14 Jun 2025 02:48:40 GMT ending during Jun-30
> 
> (Note: The above does not explicitly show time for
> distribution of the updates around the world.)
> 
> So, more than a month for the interval between builds
> finishing.
> 
> No main-arm64/main-armv7 builds have started using pkg
> 2.2+ yet. The next to start should be using pkg 2.2.1 .
> 
> pkg 2.2.1 usage in future builds should help with this
> some, but not greatly, an issue unique to main-* .
> 
> 
> 142arm64/142releng-armv7/135arm64/143releng-armv7 on ampere3
> (these are all latest: ampere1 deals with quarterly)
> 
> As stands, the build machine ampere3 cycles between building
> each of the 4 types of latest build. Individually these
> builds do not take as long as the main-* ones do. But there
> are 4 builds in the cycle instead of 2 builds.
> 
> But, these builds do do not take nearly as long and manage to
> commonly be somewhat more incremental from one to the next as
> well, more often than the main-* ones do.
> 
> Using 142arm64 as the cycle boundary example sequence,
> incremental builds involved:
> 
> Fri, 30 May 2025 17:00:08 GMT ended during Jun-8
> . . . 3 other types of builds, then: . . .
> Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:06:30 GMT ended during Jul-8
> 
> (Note: The above does not explicitly show time for
> distribution of the updates around the world.)
> 
> So, about a month for the interval between
> 142arm64 builds completing, despite 4 types of
> builds being done in a cycle.
> 
> The first pkg 2.2+ based build (135arm64 using
> pkg 2.2.1) started on Tue, 08 Jul 2025 03:07:25 GMT
> and has under 4000 packages to go.
> 
> Unlike for main-*, the pkg 2.2.1 usage should be a
> far more noticeable improvement vs. when pkg 2.1.*
> was in use. But it is going to be a while before a
> full cycle of updates using 2.2.1 has completed
> in order to have measurements.



===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.