Re: bin/ln & WARNS=5
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[email protected]> 15 Jul 2002 13:17:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.audit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Giorgos Keramidas <[email protected]> writes: > My intuition was that size_t being unsigned won't require truncation > of the (int) return value... But if one wanted to explicitly make > both a check for (-1) and the return value being less than the size of > the buffer would the following be more proper? Looks good to me, apart from the extra parentheses around the argument to sizeof. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [email protected] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message