Re: bin/ln & WARNS=5

On 2002-07-15 13:17 +0000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas <[email protected]> writes:
> > My intuition was that size_t being unsigned won't require truncation
> > of the (int) return value...  But if one wanted to explicitly make
> > both a check for (-1) and the return value being less than the size of
> > the buffer would the following be more proper?
>
> Looks good to me, apart from the extra parentheses around the argument
> to sizeof.

/me picks up notebook to learn a bit :)

What's wrong with sizeof(...)?  I thought that style(9) was actually
encouraging the use of parentheses for the arguments of sizeof, when
it mentioned:

     Casts and sizeof's are not followed by a space.  Note that
     indent(1) does not understand this rule.

- Giorgos


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message