Re: git: ceee1def00 - main - articles/committers-guide: Document change in MFH policy
Fernando Apesteguía <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.cvs.doc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGwOe2YaUwnv+H79pGKendFBk6D=B10eOe8mpRTym8Zfxxb9AQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:39 PM Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 20/04/2021 14:28, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:32:23AM +0000, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > >> The branch main has been updated by 0mp: > >> > >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/doc/commit/?id=ceee1def00ac69f06b9d86b2fb1ff04bb6c84d48 > >> > >> commit ceee1def00ac69f06b9d86b2fb1ff04bb6c84d48 > >> Author: Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> > >> AuthorDate: 2021-04-20 10:14:58 +0000 > >> Commit: Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> > >> CommitDate: 2021-04-20 10:14:58 +0000 > >> > >> articles/committers-guide: Document change in MFH policy > >> > >> Merging commits into the quarterly branch no longer requires an explicit > >> approval [1]. Let's remove outdated documentation and leave a note > >> explaining that there is no need for an explicit approval to MFH. > > Note that the MFH line should still be used to note intent. > Hmm, true. It does make sense to leave MFH in the table of metadata fields for this use case. I'll > bring back the MFH entry with an updated definition. The template still says: # MFH: <Ports tree branch name. Request approval for merge.> Maybe something like "State your intention to merge this change" would be more appropriate. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-doc-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"