Re: git: ceee1def00 - main - articles/committers-guide: Document change in MFH policy
Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.cvs.doc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/04/2021 15:12, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:39 PM Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 20/04/2021 14:28, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:32:23AM +0000, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: >>>> The branch main has been updated by 0mp: >>>> >>>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/doc/commit/?id=ceee1def00ac69f06b9d86b2fb1ff04bb6c84d48 >>>> >>>> commit ceee1def00ac69f06b9d86b2fb1ff04bb6c84d48 >>>> Author: Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> >>>> AuthorDate: 2021-04-20 10:14:58 +0000 >>>> Commit: Mateusz Piotrowski <[email protected]> >>>> CommitDate: 2021-04-20 10:14:58 +0000 >>>> >>>> articles/committers-guide: Document change in MFH policy >>>> >>>> Merging commits into the quarterly branch no longer requires an explicit >>>> approval [1]. Let's remove outdated documentation and leave a note >>>> explaining that there is no need for an explicit approval to MFH. >>> Note that the MFH line should still be used to note intent. >> Hmm, true. It does make sense to leave MFH in the table of metadata fields for this use case. I'll >> bring back the MFH entry with an updated definition. > The template still says: > > # MFH: <Ports tree branch name. Request approval for merge.> > > Maybe something like "State your intention to merge this change" would > be more appropriate. Good point! Here are some reviews for the hooks if you are interested: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29861 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29860 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29858 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-doc-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"